<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MC+A &#187; SharePoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/tag/sharepoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcplusa.com</link>
	<description>Connecting Business Intellingence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Features of 6.4 : Head Requestor Deny Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/08/hidden-features-of-6-4-head-requestor-deny-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/08/hidden-features-of-6-4-head-requestor-deny-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forms Authentication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Header Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hidden Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcplusa.com/?p=1160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Problem Header requests is the default method for how the Google Search Appliance (GSA) performs authorization on a document level (also known as late binding) for web based content (See The Header Requester).  There are numerous advantages and disadvantages.  One of the minuses, is that it relies on the content source to adhere to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>The Problem</h2>
<p>Header requests is the default method for how the <a title="Buy a GSA!" href="http://shop.mcplusa.com/Category/52-buy_google_search_appliance.aspx">Google Search Appliance</a> (GSA) performs authorization on a document level (also known as late binding) for web based content (See <a title="Google Documentation On Header Requestor" href="http://code.google.com/apis/searchappliance/documentation/64/troubleshooting/headrequestor.html">The Header Requester</a>).  There are numerous advantages and disadvantages.  One of the minuses, is that it relies on the content source to adhere to HTTP protocols.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve experienced numerous content systems that don&#8217;t fully support the correct HTTP response for this to work.  In many cases of Lotus Domino or<a title="Security Issues With Head Approach TO MS Sharepoint" href="http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/01/security-issues-with-the-head-approach-to-authorizing-sharepoint-content/"> Microsoft SharePoint</a>, a friendly message is return or their is an embedded header.  This causes the to misinterpret the response from the server and think the user has access to the document.</p>
<p>The common method pre 6.4 was to implement a SAML interface and develop custom code to handle the logic for the variety of content sources.  Google released several Open Source projects to jump start your efforts.  Most notably they are:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://code.google.com/p/gsa-valve-security-framework/">Google Value Security Framework</a></li>
<li><a href="http://code.google.com/p/google-saml-bridge-for-windows/">Google SAML Bridge for Windows</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>The Solution: Header Request Deny Rules</h2>
<p>Those tended to be difficult for our clients to implement and another piece of infrastructure to deploy and manage.  In version 6.4, Google has added additional rule validation on the appliance.  You now can check the most common sets on the appliance with simple configuration:</p>
<div id="attachment_1161" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/header_request_deny_rule.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1161" title="header_request_deny_rule" src="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/header_request_deny_rule-300x168.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="168" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Screen shot of the Header Request Deny Rule Form</p></div>
<p>This virtually eliminates many of the customizations that we&#8217;ve made for the wrong response.  How Neat!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/08/hidden-features-of-6-4-head-requestor-deny-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great Tool For Debugging Kerberos with IIS</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/02/great-tool-for-debugging-kerberos-with-iis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/02/great-tool-for-debugging-kerberos-with-iis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debugging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerberos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tricks of the trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/02/great-tool-for-debugging-kerberos-with-iis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the Google Search Appliance introduced support for both Microsoft SharePoint and Kerberos many of our customers have begun to implement Kerberos more often technology.&#160; Kerberos with SharePoint can provide a Single Sign On technology that is silent.&#160; However, the reason that most companies have not implemented Kerberos because it’s difficult to debug.&#160; I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the Google Search Appliance introduced support for both Microsoft SharePoint and Kerberos many of our customers have begun to implement Kerberos more often technology.&#160; </p>
<p>Kerberos with SharePoint can provide a Single Sign On technology that is silent.&#160; However, the reason that most companies have not implemented Kerberos because it’s difficult to debug.&#160; I have found this tool develop by Brian Murphy to save weeks of debugging time.&#160; It’s easy to set up and provides tests for Kerberos authentication as well as delegation.</p>
<p><a title="http://blogs.iis.net/brian-murphy-booth/archive/2007/03/09/delegconfig-delegation-configuration-reporting-tool.aspx" href="http://blogs.iis.net/brian-murphy-booth/archive/2007/03/09/delegconfig-delegation-configuration-reporting-tool.aspx">http://blogs.iis.net/brian-murphy-booth/archive/2007/03/09/delegconfig-delegation-configuration-reporting-tool.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/02/great-tool-for-debugging-kerberos-with-iis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Issues with the HEAD approach to authorizing SharePoint content</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/01/security-issues-with-the-head-approach-to-authorizing-sharepoint-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/01/security-issues-with-the-head-approach-to-authorizing-sharepoint-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePointError]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/01/security-issues-with-the-head-approach-to-authorizing-sharepoint-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, while working on a Google Search Appliance implementation involving a custom SAML interface users were being returned documents in some cases which they did not have access to. In reviewing the logs, we found that SharePoint was responding with an HTTP status of 200. The GSA resolves late binding by performing a head request. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, while working on a <a href="http://shop.mcplusa.com/products/gb7007500k3dnstd-gb-7007-google-search-appliance-with-500k-document-index-and-2-year-support" target="_blank">Google Search Appliance</a> implementation involving a custom SAML interface users were being returned documents in some cases which they did not have access to. In reviewing the logs, we found that SharePoint was responding with an <a href="http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html">HTTP status of 200</a>.</p>
<p>The GSA resolves late binding by performing a <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/searchappliance/documentation/52/troubleshooting/headrequestor.html" target="_blank">head request</a>. Our case involved a user being granted access to a document by the GSA that they shouldn&#8217;t have.  For reasons unknown, when one user accessed a page, they got a 401 (unauthorized) and when another use accessed the page, they got an error.  Both users were not able to access the document.</p>
<p>The head request was something similar to:<br />
<img title="image" border="0" alt="head request" src="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/image.png" width="334" height="62" /></p>
<p>This appears to be a standard 200 response, but it contains something interesting. There is an additional header called <em>SharePointError</em>.  In digging around MSDN, I found <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd912033.aspx" target="_blank">this article</a> .  The SAML bridge had to be modified to check for this head in addition to the response.  The existence of this header does not indicate a failure, only that it needs to be future examined to see if the user has access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2010/01/security-issues-with-the-head-approach-to-authorizing-sharepoint-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Search Appliance Connectors 2.4 released</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/12/google-search-appliance-connectors-2-4-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/12/google-search-appliance-connectors-2-4-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/12/google-search-appliance-connectors-2-4-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Google release version 2.4.  This is the first public accessible version of the connectors.  Connections as part of this release are: SharePoint Documentum LiveLink FileNet File Systems – new (aka beta) Databases – new (aka beta) Upon first view of them, it looks like they incorporate many of the suggestions we have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, Google release version 2.4.  This is the first public accessible version of the connectors.  Connections as part of this release are:</p>
<ul>
<li>SharePoint</li>
<li>Documentum</li>
<li>LiveLink</li>
<li>FileNet</li>
<li>File Systems – <strong>new (aka beta)</strong></li>
<li>Databases – <strong>new (aka beta)</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Upon first view of them, it looks like they incorporate many of the suggestions we have posted on this blog over the past few months.  (i.e. use javascript to produce the <a href="http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/08/can-the-google-mini-index-sharepoint/" target="_blank">results</a> [Thanks Jon Doctor!]).  We’ll be posting a how to get the best search out of SharePoint with a Google Search Appliance shortly.</p>
<p>Customers interested in assistance with deployment of the connectors please <a href="http://www.mcplusa.com/contact/" target="_blank">contact us</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/12/google-search-appliance-connectors-2-4-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SharePoint 2010 and Office 2010 Betas Released</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/11/sharepoint-2010-and-office-2010-betas-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/11/sharepoint-2010-and-office-2010-betas-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/11/sharepoint-2010-and-office-2010-betas-released/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Microsoft released the new Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010 public beta.  This is is the first public beta of the new technology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, Microsoft released the new Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010 public beta.&#160; This is is the first public beta of the new technology.</p>
<p>It’s been 3 years since the previous release of the Office.&#160; Much has changed in the economy and the enterprise landscape.&#160; We just download the versions and will begin to test them and report back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/11/sharepoint-2010-and-office-2010-betas-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the Google Mini index documents stored in Microsoft Sharepoint?</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/08/can-the-google-mini-index-sharepoint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/08/can-the-google-mini-index-sharepoint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google SharePoint Sitemap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcplusa.com/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article shows how the Google Mini can be integrated with Microsoft SharePoint.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Answer: Yes &#8211; The Google Mini Can Index documents stored in Micrsoft SharePoint!</h3>
<p><a id="single_image" href="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sharepoint-edit1.jpg"></a></p>
<p>The <a title="Google Mini Product Page" href="http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/mini.html" target="_blank">Google Mini </a>along with the <a href="http://www.mcplusa.com/solutions/enterprise-search/google-sharepoint-sitemap">MC+A Google SharePoint Sitemap</a> can effectively be configured to crawl Microsoft SharePoint sites.  The MC+A Google SharePoint Sitemap produces a dyanmic site map which the Mini can use to crawl deep within SharePoint.   You can further enhance this by adding a Content Web Part onto the search page which will allow you to have the Google Mini produce search results within SharePoint.</p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s it working in our environment. </strong><br />
<a id="single_image" href="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cizmar-breetai1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-630" title="Search results page" src="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/cizmar-breetai1-300x197.jpg" alt="Search results page" width="300" height="197" /></a></p>
<p><strong>and in edit mode:</strong></p>
<p><a id="single_image" href="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sharepoint-edit1.jpg"><img title="The Search Result Page In Edit Mode" src="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sharepoint-edit1-300x187.jpg" alt="The Search Result Page In Edit Mode" width="300" height="187" /></a></p>
<p>How is the integration achieved?</p>
<p>Step 1 &#8211; Navigate to the search results page<br />
Step 2 &#8211; Switch the search results page to edit mode<br />
Step 3 &#8211; Delete the SharePoint search web parts<br />
Step 4 &#8211; Add content editor web part<br />
Step 5 Add the following code(modify for your environment)<br />
<a href="http://www.mcplusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/sharepointcontent.txt">Content for web part</a></p>
<p><strong>How does this work?</strong><br />
1) SharePoint search web part reads the k parameter query string and makes an &#8216;ajax&#8217; type of request to the appliance.<br />
2) The end use broswer communicates directly with the Mini.</p>
<p>If you purchase a Google Mini from MC+A, we offer a <a title="Learn More about the MC+A Google SharePoint Sitemap" href="http://www.mcplusa.com/solutions/enterprise-search/google-sharepoint-sitemap/">free GSS</a> with support matching for the term of the Google Mini. Otherwise, the product lists for $500 and includes a 30 day trial support during the trial. MC+A professional services can be engaged to assist with the integration within SharePoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2009/08/can-the-google-mini-index-sharepoint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SiteData and the SharePoint Feeder for GSA</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2008/02/sitedata-and-the-sharepoint-feeder-for-gsa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2008/02/sitedata-and-the-sharepoint-feeder-for-gsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An increasing number of our customers are discovering the undocument limitation in the SharePoint Web Service SiteData. While this API is sparsely documented to begin with, users are not aware that if there are over 1000 subsites within an Application (i.e. http://mysharepoint.company.com ) the GetSite method returns no subsites. As you would expect, having subsites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An increasing number of our customers are discovering the undocument limitation in the SharePoint Web Service SiteData.  While this API is sparsely documented to begin with, users are not aware that if there are over 1000 subsites within an Application (i.e. <a href="http://mysharepoint.company.com/">http://mysharepoint.company.com</a> ) the GetSite method returns no subsites.  As you would expect, having subsites is critical to any type of crawl functionality.</p>
<p>Until Microsoft fully discloses the bug, you can read Joel Oleson, and some commentors, discuss how its used as part of SharePoint.  It&#8217;s really unknown how this bug impacts SharePoint functionlaity.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/joelo/archive/2008/01/28/anatomy-of-indexing.aspx">http://blogs.msdn.com/joelo/archive/2008/01/28/anatomy-of-indexing.aspx</a></p>
<p>Because of this limitation, MC+A pulled the vetern GSS Web Part out of the closet and developed the GSS into the <a href="http://www.mcplusa.com/solutions/sharepointfeedergooglesearchappliance.html">SFGSA</a>.  The feeder provides the same basic functionality as the Google Enterprise Connector, but utlizes the SharePoint Object Model.</p>
<p>You can request a meeting with us about it by filling out the following online form:</p>
<p><a href="https://forms.netsuite.com/app/site/crm/externalleadpage.nl?compid=603012&amp;formid=20&amp;h=cf418e757d6515df86da">Contact Us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2008/02/sitedata-and-the-sharepoint-feeder-for-gsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MC+A GSS 2.6 Released as Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2007/10/gss-26-released-as-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2007/10/gss-26-released-as-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following features have been added: Multiple Start Ulrs (so it can support more then one sharepoint instance) All configuration settings accessible from the administrative interface More to come shortly!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following features have been added:</p>
<ul>
<li>Multiple Start Ulrs (so it can support more then one sharepoint instance)</li>
<li>All configuration settings accessible from the administrative interface</li>
</ul>
<p>More to come shortly!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2007/10/gss-26-released-as-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Cizmar Interview with SearchITChannel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2007/10/michael-cizmar-interview-with-searchitchannelcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2007/10/michael-cizmar-interview-with-searchitchannelcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angelo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search Appliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MC + A&#8217;s CEO, Michael Cizmar, has been interviewed by the IT website SearchITChannel.com about his opionions and for his expertise on Google and other technologies. Check out the interview here: http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid96_gci1276994,00.html As always, if you have any questions about Google, SharePoint or how we can help you more efficiently integrate those or other technologies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC + A&#8217;s CEO, Michael Cizmar, has been interviewed by the IT website SearchITChannel.com about his opionions and for his expertise on Google and other technologies.  Check out the interview here:</p>
<p><a href="http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid96_gci1276994,00.html" target="_blank">http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid96_gci1276994,00.html</a></p>
<p>As always, if you have any questions about Google, SharePoint or how we can help you more efficiently integrate those or other technologies for your business, contact us at <a href="mailto:sales@mcplusa.com">sales@mcplusa.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcplusa.com/blog/2007/10/michael-cizmar-interview-with-searchitchannelcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

